NPR just posted an excellent blog post by nurse Kelli Dunham titled “Why Does It Take A Movie Robot To Show What Nurses Really Do?” Check it out – I think it is a wonderful example of editorial content for a wide lay audience. Kelli uses Baymax, the robot nurse in the movie Big Hero 6 to examine nursing’s media image challenges.
Add your comments in response to Kelli’s post here, and on NPR’s site!
When I returned to higher education for my Master’s Degree, my end point was to become credentialed so I could begin my dream job as an inpatient nurse practitioner. This was a new role in 1993 and I will admit that as a single woman who could afford only one year away from the paycheck, I was committed to getting in and out of my Master’s courses at Boston College quickly and efficiently. In particular, I had no aptitude or desire to become a researcher. My mind was clear that I would go through the “hoops” of the beginning research course (mandatory) and then “never do research again.” I can hear your laughter now….
So, on day one of my Master’s year, I entered Research 101 for Nurses; thoroughly prepared to hate it, pretty sure I might not pass it, and very clear that it was not pertinent to my clinical life. (Yes, one can be quite naïve, even at age 35). Amazingly, I entered a classroom taught by the most wonderful teacher of my entire academic life (I’m including grade school here too). I’ve long forgotten her name but I’ll never forget her. She taught me to love and appreciate the science of science. For 18 rapid weeks, she taught a basic exercise. Each week we were given a nursing research paper to read and then in each class, we reviewed it and discussed the paper’s merits. She, of course, chose increasingly complex papers with a variety of study designs and writing skills. Some papers were good, some terrible, some stated what they did not find, some overstated conclusions….you get the idea. Our class thrived! It sounds so naïve to admit, but we were empowered to realize that just because the researchers said it, it might not be true…because of design flaw, overreaching results, and other errors, glaring and subtle.
Our professor also taught us to appreciate that while we may not be researchers, we were intelligent…and that research should not be sloppy, unreadable, or beyond our understanding. It was up to the writer to tell us what their question was, what was known about it, explain the study design, tell us how they did it, discuss their results against their question and draw some conclusions based on what they found. She demystified the process and actually taught us to critically analyze what we read….or as my Mother said, “Don’t automatically believe everything you read”. The fact that the reader of research had a responsibility in the process changed us from observers to participants. An amazing teacher with an amazing gift.
So, research became very relevant in my clinical role and subsequent professional life….if, for no other reason, than for me to critically read research and analyze its credibility. Since entering the field of obesity care, this analysis has become increasingly important. I’m not sure if is the weight bias/discrimination inherent in the specialty or the infancy of our understanding of the causes and biology of obesity…but often the “studies” that “prove” some aspect of obesity do not pass the rigor that I was taught in Research 101. Popular press articles and studies presented at conferences and professional journals that conclude association or correlation are often misinterpreted as evidence of causation.
With the flood of open access predatory publications, this issue has moved to the forefront in my mind. These journals, with their non-existent or shoddy peer reviews processes, lack of editing and oversight, and an emphasis of meeting the needs of authors, not readers, are publishing flawed articles. On a continuum these papers range from poorly done, uninspired studies that couldn’t find a legitimate publication home, to deeply deceptive junk science reporting results that have the potential for real patient harm.
So, my thought is that it may be timely to review basic research principles at conferences, journals, and classrooms….sincerely. It has been a long time for many of us since Research 101. With so much information bombarding us daily through so many mediums, it is easy to just skim the headlines or read the conclusion of the paper. An emphasis on critical analysis of research (or what is presented as research) might remind us and our readers to take a moment to read the fine print.
This was posted on the HealthCetera blog–I wanted to share with my INANE colleagues. –LHN
Originally posted on HealthCetera - CHMP's Blog:
This post is written by Leslie H. Nicoll, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN a passionate nurse, wife, and mother. She lives in Portland, Maine where she owns her own business, Maine Desk LLC. She is the Editor-in-Chief of CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing and Editor of Nurse Author & Editor. Dr. Nicoll is an advocate for the poor and vulnerable in our society and lives this mission by working 2 1/2 days per week as the Coordinator at the Portland Community Free Clinic. Dr. Nicoll was very proud to be inducted as a Fellow in the American Academy of Nursing in October 2014.
Kaci Hickox, the nurse who was quarantined in a tent in New Jersey for four days, has become a household name—sort of. What isn’t as well publicized are her educational credentials and expertise. Nurse Hickox is presented as “just a nurse” and if one is to believe the comments…
View original 1,386 more words
As a member of Editorial Board for the Journal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing (JPSN) Editorial Board, my role is to mentor authors who ask for assistance. I enjoy working with colleagues on these projects and find (as always) that I learn much more than I offer. Most of the authors thus far are newer in the profession and have less clinical experience. This brings the challenge of helping them fill in the literature, clinical, and research gaps.
But, my most recent mentoring challenge is an expert clinical nurse who feels that she does not have anything “data driven” to write. This is despite the fact that for over 25 years, she has worked with a specific patient population, collaborated with the leading physician expert, earned two Master’s degrees, and is seen as the clinical expert by colleagues both novice and expert (as they tell me themselves).
When I asked her, “What do you want to say?” she was able to concisely tell me her thoughts on orthopedic pin care, take me through the full circle history of where we were, why it didn’t work, what they found worked, and now, frustratingly, a return to the original method of 25 years ago with little data to support this trend.
We strategized a bit and came up with a plan (any ideas you have are also welcome!)
But my question for the group goes beyond pin care…..my colleague brings up an interesting question in my mind. How does JPSN capture her history? Not for pin care (we’re working on that one) but her history of our profession. In an hour of speaking with her…and then in speaking with another nurse who referred her to me from her institution, it is quite clear that this woman has a great story. She has lived, worked, and exemplified our nursing legacy. I am confident that we will capture what she wants to say about pin care. I am worried that we will lose her story of a fabulous, devoted career when she retires.
So, my musing for all of you is how do we at JPSN document this era of nursing? And validate these nurses’ contributions? My “mentee” told me that she did not think she had anything she could write since she did not do formal research. Yet she knew her team’s infection rates (or lack thereof) from her infection control colleagues, supports data driven care, and supports nursing’s progress to maintain our place at any management table.
How do you capture these nurses’ special contributions and history at your journal? Thanks for educating me as a mentor!
I found this post particularly interesting in an era when associations are carefully scrutinizing cost to value relationships in publishing our journals. I’ve had many conversations with our association about why our costs for publishing continue to rise and there are several useful suggestions in this list that are not evident to those outside the editing and publishing arenas.
Originally posted on The Scholarly Kitchen:
Back in the summer of 2012, I wrote a post outlining 60 things journal publishers do (with many of these applying to publishers of books and other scholarly formats, as well). The post was written because journal publishers have been under pressure to prove that they add value beyond managing peer-review and doing some basic copy editing and formatting. Often, authors are the ones asserting that journal publishers do so little, which is understandable, as authors only experience a small part of the journal publishing process, and care about the editing and formatting bits the most, making those the most memorable.
A recent survey of authors by the Nature Publishing Group suggests that journal reputation, relevance to the discipline, quality of peer review, and impact factor are the four items driving most of their decision-making about where to submit. This helps put some items listed below into perspective — branding…
View original 4,494 more words
As I skimmed the list of newly released books at the iStore, I was drawn to the cover of the book The News Sorority by Sheila Weller. The subtitle of the book is “Diane Sawyer, Katie Couric, Christiane Amanpour-and the (Ongoing, Imperfect, Complicated) Triumph of Women in TV News”.
I’ll be honest; I was hoping to learn more about Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric. Full disclosure, I do not watch the news and very little TV. I certainly did as a child/adolescent and young adult….but for a number of reasons (a distaste for conflict being one), I purposefully turned away from watching television news (and most television except sports and HGTV) in my thirties. I remain conversant with world, national, and local events, feel that I am a responsible citizen. But, I have long since become disillusioned by the drama and sound bites of what is currently presented on television.
This is not a critique of The News Sorority….I did enjoy the book and if you like women’s history, writing, and journalism (as I suspect most of you do), then you’ll more than likely be able to critique this book much better than me.
What I wanted to share was my awakening to the person who is Christiane Amanpour. I had certainly heard of her, seen her reports on CNN…but as is suggested in this book, her “international” reporting and “foreign” birth/heritage somehow made her less important than her colleagues, Diane and Katie, especially in the highly competitive world of American television news.
The book is divided into sections, each featuring the three women alternately several times. I expected to skim through Christiane’s sections but found that the opposite was true….I skipped the others to read more about her life. And what a life it is! The review of her birth, upbringing, education, profession, international reporting, and “late marriage and motherhood” is the stuff produced by fiction novelists. In fact, if you were reading such a novel, you might think it too over the top! Who lives like that?!
Well, Christiane does…..but of course, so do Diane and Katie. So, what drew me to Christiane? I think it is her willingness to go into the danger and speak for those who can’t speak for themselves…repeatedly. Certainly, many journalists do that (and danger does not need to be purely physical). But it is her relentless pursuit because it is the right thing to do that stands out to me. How courageous is that? Her reporting can be dramatic (bullets flying) or simply reporting as a witness to a wrong. She tells the story for those who cannot.
There are many lessons, much courage, women’s rights, injustices, andmore in all three women’s stories….but for some reason this day, Christiane’s voice speaks to me above the others….she reminds me to be me. She reminds me that although my style is different than others, it is effective for me and that gives me an opportunity. In my professional life, I have the opportunity to speak for children who are affected by weight….and for their families. I have the chance to dispel some myths, offer some physiology, and show how bias, discrimination, and mockery affect my patients.
It is hard. As a pediatric nurse, I am used to the public and colleagues praising my efforts to help children (valid or not). As a nurse taking care of children affected by obesity, I have experienced a “come-up-ance” as my husband would say….and have felt in a very minor way the daily abuse that confronts these children and their parents. It would be so easy to walk away….but they can’t so I try to carry on and help as I can. Christiane seems to find the strength to be a witness and write the story…and by doing that, provide inspiration to others to do the same.
The 2014 INANE conference in Maine was more than fun … it was productive! We have the project on “predatory publishers” well underway, and another project addressing student papers that are submitted for publication is gearing up. Shawn Kennedy is spear-heading this initiative, and is issuing a call for other Editors to work with her on this project. Here is Shawn’s description:
Many editors have commented about being inundated with unpublishable papers written by students to fulfill course requirements. However, from the state of many of these papers, the students have not received the necessary coaching around writing for scholarly publications or how to go about submitting their papers. Several editors voiced interest in developing some guidelines/position statement/white paper addressing this common problem.
If you are interested in being part of this important work, let Shawn know! Click here to send her an email!
New Treasurer for National League for Nursing
Washington, DC- A new treasurer was sworn into office on Friday, September 20 at the NLN’s annual Business Meeting.Patricia Yoder-Wise, EdD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN, ANEF, was installed as Board of Governors (BOG) treasurer.
“I am always awed by the enthusiasm of colleagues to step up to the responsibility of board service, and this year is no exception,” said NLN CEO Beverly Malone, PhD, RN, FAAN, in congratulating the winners of the 2014 NLN elections. “On the League’s behalf, I extend a warm welcome to the newest additions to the BOG. I look forward to a productive year.”
Added NLN President Marsha Howell Adams, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, a professor and the dean of the College of Nursing at the University of Alabama in Huntsville: “The talent, expertise, and collective years of leadership in nursing education that our board represents will continue to enhance the NLN’s effectiveness as it moves forward to promote excellence in nursing education to build a strong and diverse nursing workforce to advance the health of our nation and the global community.”
Patricia Yoder-Wise, dean emerita and professor emerita of the Health Sciences Center School of Nursing at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, was a 2012 winner of the prestigious NLN Award for Outstanding Leadership in Nursing Education. She has touched the careers of many colleagues and aspiring nurse educators through her writing, which includes the well-known volume, Leading and Managing in Nursing; numerous scholarly articles; and 25 years as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing: Continuing Competence for the Future and for three years ofNursing Forum. Although retired from the Texas Tech administration since 2000, Dr. Yoder-Wise remains active in nursing organizations and continues to teach at Texas Tech, Texas Woman’s University, and the University of Texas in San Antonio. She has served as president of the Texas Nurses Association and the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and treasurer of the American Academy of Nursing.